Virginia Employment Law Blog
On August 21, the U.S. Department of Treasury issued a
proposed rule that would amend the Department’s Acquisition Regulation to
comply with the Dodd-Frank Act. Dodd-Frank Section 342 created an Office of
Published on:
Was the Saints’ Bounty Program an ERISA Covered Plan?
Ok. Well. Probably not, but this might be a useful (maybe even fun) way to review the factors for determining what is and what is not a “plan” under ERISA.
So, let’s give it a shot.
First, the law:
Published on:
Quick Link: GAO: Half of 401(k) plan execs don’t know what fees they pay
According to this article from Pensions & Investments, half of employers could not accurate indentify the fees charged to participants in their 401(k) plans.
As we’ve discussed in earlier posts, such as this one about 401(k) plans for small businesses, ERISA’s fiduciary provisions are expansive. It is hard to imagine a responsible fiduciary who has satisfied his duties of prudence and loyalty, but cannot identify the fees charged to participants in the 401(k) he administers.
We’ll talk more about fiduciary duties in later posts, but the headline is clear for this post: 401(k) fees are opaque and you aren’t the only one who is confused. The people in charge don’t understand either.
Published on:
Retirement 101: What is a Target Date Fund, Anyway?
When you look over the investment options in your retirement plan, you probably see a 2020 fund, a 2030 fund, a 2040 fund, and on up the line. Those are “target date funds.” They can be mutual funds, exchange traded funds, or pooled separate accounts. But what are they and what are they designed to do?*
A target date fund is an investment vehicle that invests in equites, bonds, and other funds. What’s different about a target date fund is its stated goal. It does not claim to simply maximize your investment return.
A target date fund’s goal is to gradually transition your retirement savings – from riskier investments when you are young to safer investments when you near retirement. A 2040 fund will be highly invested in stocks with very few of its assets devoted to safe investment vehicles like bonds. For example, this John Hancock mutual fund, the Retirement Living through 2040 Portfolio, has only 4.6% of its assets devoted to bonds and nearly 35.7% of its assets devoted to aggressive growth stocks.**
Published on:
Quick Link: Illinois Bill to Protect Employees’ Social Media Goes to Governor
The Chicago Tribune reports that a bill to protect current and prospective employees from requirements to provide their social media passwords to their employers has gone to Governor Quinn.
If this bill is signed into law, Illinois will join Maryland as the only two states with these sorts of protections in place.
Published on:
New EEOC Guidance: CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS AND THE EMPLOYER
Employers regularly use criminal background checks and credit checks to narrow their list of applicants. High unemployment has vastly expanded the applicant pool and employers now have the luxury of selecting only the most qualified candidates. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) had been largely quiet on the legality of these somewhat invasive tests since 1990 but has now issued new guidance.
CAN I STILL DO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS ON APPLICANTS?
Yes. The ability to do a background check on a job applicant has not been substantially limited. What has been greatly changed is the employer’s use of information obtained in a background check. Employers have been asked by the EEOC to no longer throw out an application because of a prior arrest or general conviction.
Published on:
California Pension Fund to Vote Against Wal-Mart Board
The California State Teachers’ Retirement System (“CalSTRS”), America’s second largest pension fund, announced that it would vote its nearly six million shares against the retention of Wal-Mart’s board of directors. This decision comes in the wake of Wal-Mart’s ongoing Mexican bribery scandal.
This is an important story for pension governance and fiduciary responsibility. Entirely too often, the discussion about pension investment is focused on inaction.
CalSTRS has not fallen into this trap. It has pursued legal action over alleged failures in corporate governance and now it will vote its against the board. These are proactive steps made to protect the fund’s investment and its investors, the teachers of the State of California.
Published on:
Protecting Your Retirement Savings: How You Can Use ERISA
Are the losses in your 401(k) plan due to poor investment performance or high administrative fees? Or both? Could either have been avoided? And whose responsibility was it to oversee those issues?
Retirement plans are governed by obscure law, are complex in nature, and include complicated investment products. Participants rarely understand their 401(k) plans or the investment options presented to them. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) provides participants with the right to take action against irresponsible plan fiduciaries, but what good is that when it is nearly impossible to know if a plan is being run well?
In short, employees simply do not know if they are getting a good deal or a bad one with their 401(k).
Published on:
Quick Link: The 6th Circuit Discusses ERISA’s 6 Year Statute of Limitations
Check out this entry by Suzanne Wynn at The Pension Protection Act Blog on the 6th Circuits recent discussion on whether ERISA’s 6 year statute of limitations on fraud requires actual concealment by fiduciaries. It’s a good read and we’ll address this issue on the Erlich Law Blog at a later date.
Published on:
FMLA Basics Everyone Should Know
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) is a federal law requiring employers to grant paid leave in certain situations for employees. It was written in order to help American employees take care of their families, loved ones, and themselves in the case of medical necessity. Not all employees are covered and requirements for coverage vary state-by-state.
Are you covered by the FMLA?
The federal FMLA only applies to employers with 50 or more employees within 75 miles of the employee’s jobsite. If you work at a company with less than 50 employees, you generally are not covered. The employee must also have worked for their employer for over a year and worked at least 1,250 hours in the last 12 months. Some states, however, have lessened the threshold for coverage in their state’s version of the FMLA.